Thursday, October 29, 2009
drive-by blogging
Main Entry: big·ot
Pronunciation: \ˈbi-gət\
Function: noun
Etymology: French, hypocrite, bigot
Date: 1660
1: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance
2: (slang) a title assigned to a point of view with which once cannot be reconciled; usually, for the sake of gaining the moral high ground.
— big·ot·ed \-gə-təd\ adjective
— big·ot·ed·ly adverb
Pronunciation: \ˈbi-gət\
Function: noun
Etymology: French, hypocrite, bigot
Date: 1660
1: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance
2: (slang) a title assigned to a point of view with which once cannot be reconciled; usually, for the sake of gaining the moral high ground.
— big·ot·ed \-gə-təd\ adjective
— big·ot·ed·ly adverb
Monday, October 26, 2009
Saturday, October 24, 2009
Rap and Bad Art (2)
OK -- we left off this topic with a question last time:
So the answer to the question "is there bad music?" must be YES if you are a Christian. It "must be" because, as William Lane Craig points out, beauty is not defined by scientific means, nor strictly or primarily by means of consensus. It is something like "Truth" which has, at its root, God as its source. Disconnecting Beauty from God is, simply another kind of idolatry.
So the next question is this:
Is all bad art a moral offense?
You work on that and we'll take it up later.
All fiction is not bad. All art is not bad. But there is bad fiction and bad art, as described above.And in the tumult which ensued, we really got to the heart of the question because you are the smartest readers in the blogosphere. Logan crashed through the brick wall when he posted this:
And in this, we need to think about this carefully: is there, therefore, bad music?
Here's the deal-breaker for me.To which I provided the following definition:
The definitions.
Frankly, Frank, if we all go by the definition of "bad music" as being morally wrong rather than aesthetically wrong; you will have us standing up and cheering you on more than Pelosi whenever Obama utters a syllable.
I was actually reading through Blackaby's book on spiritual leadership for a small group and because he doesn't define stuff, the philosophy major (who'd been reading Locke, who is an avid definer of terms, just before he started reading Blackaby) had a horrible time drudging through the lack of definitions and vagueness.
let us define.

- Main Entry: aesthetic
Variant(s): also esthetic
Function: noun
Date: 1822
1 plural but sing or plural in constr : a branch of philosophy dealing with the nature of beauty, art, and taste and with the creation and appreciation of beauty
2 : a particular theory or conception of beauty or art : a particular taste for or approach to what is pleasing to the senses and especially sight [modernist aesthetics] [staging new ballets which reflected the aesthetic of the new nation — Mary Clarke & Clement Crisp]
3 plural : a pleasing appearance or effect : beauty [appreciated the aesthetics of the gemstones]
So the answer to the question "is there bad music?" must be YES if you are a Christian. It "must be" because, as William Lane Craig points out, beauty is not defined by scientific means, nor strictly or primarily by means of consensus. It is something like "Truth" which has, at its root, God as its source. Disconnecting Beauty from God is, simply another kind of idolatry.
So the next question is this:
Is all bad art a moral offense?
You work on that and we'll take it up later.
Friday, October 23, 2009
Free Stuff
Tony Kummer is trolling for readers for his newest edition to his Kummeropolis empire, and he's started Devotional Christian.
And he's giving books away. Go get some.
And he's giving books away. Go get some.
4 hours of sleep a night
Yeah, look: I don't need more than 4 hours of sleep a night. That's why I accepted the responsibility of owning the hallowed URL CalvinistGadfly.com.
I am accepting suggestions at this time, btw, for how to fill the bandwidth.
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Trent Session 4
Regarding the Sacred Scriptures:
But if any one receive not, as sacred and canonical, the said books entire with all their parts, as they have been used to be read in the Catholic Church, and as they are contained in the old Latin vulgate edition; and knowingly and deliberately contemn the traditions aforesaid; let him be anathema.It's going to come up. Keep this available for future review.
Monday, October 19, 2009
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
A brief moment of Nostalgia
I have no idea how this video stumbled across my desktop today, but here it is:
The only reason I'm sharing it is that it is my favorite memory of college. It also relates to the idea of good art vs. bad art.
So you enjoy that while I get my life caught up and I can blog like I mean it.
The only reason I'm sharing it is that it is my favorite memory of college. It also relates to the idea of good art vs. bad art.
So you enjoy that while I get my life caught up and I can blog like I mean it.
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
sparkhouse: fail
Before you hit play, he says a naughty word in the middle -- the bad word for "backside". It makes him far more transparent, I am sure.
This, btw, is why "emerg*" is a failure: this may be the dumbest 55 seconds of video ever produced (including all the rest of YouTube) regarding the state and future of human history, and yet it's been published as a way to spark new life into the "church".
Blah blah blah indeed. Honestly: how do you parody this?
This, btw, is why "emerg*" is a failure: this may be the dumbest 55 seconds of video ever produced (including all the rest of YouTube) regarding the state and future of human history, and yet it's been published as a way to spark new life into the "church".
Blah blah blah indeed. Honestly: how do you parody this?







As you undoubtedly noticed, I like comics. I wouldn't call myself a "fan boy" because I don't give a flying FOOM what they are worth. That said, almost all the images on my blog are scanned from comics I own -- so they are scanned from comics I own and are used under what I assume is 
