As you undoubtedly noticed, I like comics. I wouldn't call myself a "fan boy" because I don't give a flying FOOM what they are worth. That said, almost all the images on my blog are scanned from comics I own -- so they are scanned from comics I own and are used under what I assume is the basic tenets of "fair use" under copyright law. It would be frankly impossible to tell you where each images comes from specifically.
Many are © and/or ® Marvel Comics Group, with all rights reserved.
Others are © and/or ® DC Comics, which is an arm of Time/Warner, and not only are all rights reserved but they are a little jealous about it, so if I get "the letter" from them, those images are just going to turn into blank spots until I configure out what to do about that.
There are also the occasional images from Valiant, Image, Defiant, Dark Horse, and some indies which I'm not sure even have a name, and they are all also © and/or ®, all rights reserved.
All other images not covered by this disclaimer are the property of their respective owners, and if you are one of those people and you see your image on my blog, tell me what you want me to do about it and I will. No sense making people angry.
Hope that helps.
2 comments:
Are we looking at a proposed synergism in the first picture?
Mark
Man! I can't even straighten out my monday morning at work without some smart guy asking questions.
I'll be honest: I didn't read Newbigin's original work. I only read Driscoll's summary of it in Radional Reformission. But here's why Driscoll included it. He wanted to establish the following equations:
Gospel + Culture - Church = Parachurch
Culture + Church - Gospel = Liberalism
Church + Gospel - Culture = Fundamentalism
And rather than rant about each of these (and they are all rantable as far as I'm concerned), I'd rather just say, as a continuing part of the teaser, that as a paradigm the diagram is completely inadequate, and the applications or corollaries that Driscoll/Newbigins provide are, um, not very useful except to make a point that they were going to try to kake anyway. They are stacking the deck with the paradigm, and then they don't really address the problems with their view.
But what are they trying to say and why? Did they simply start from a lousy place but, becuase they are experienced people who do know something about God's word and taking the Gospel to the lost, they incidentally got some things right?
Stay tuned and we'll see.
Post a Comment